View Full Version : BS closures for coral


Sasquatch
06-27-2008, 01:03 AM
Link: http://www.newsobserver.com/1565/story/1109468.html

Here are some snippets:

Now environmentalists want to see these deepwater reefs protected, and they're hoping a president possibly looking to spruce up his environmental legacy before he leaves office might help them do it. The reefs cover an area nearly the size of South Carolina

Oh goodie, let's decree an underwater 51st state and call it "East Busholina".

The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, which manages fishing in federal waters in the Southeast, is looking at declaring the coral reefs "Habitat Areas of Particular Concern." But a presidential declaration, such as one declaring the reefs national monuments, would add even more layers of protection although Rader stressed that no one was pushing to have fishing outlawed around the reefs.

Yeah, my ass.

President Bush hasn't exactly been seen as a friend of the environmental movement during his nearly eight years in office. Presidents, however, have a history of wanting to leave a lasting legacy, and that's what the environmental community is banking on.

There also is recent precedent for this. Two years ago, Bush created the 140,000-square-mile Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Marine National Monument, which is the world's largest protected marine area. The White House has yet to take a position on the idea of designating the Southeast's reefs a marine national monument. But last month South Carolina's Republican Gov. Mark Sanford came out in favor of the proposal, calling the deepwater habitats a "national treasure on par with Yosemite Valley and the Northwest Hawaiian Islands."

Rader said officials also have been in touch with Gov. Mike Easley here in North Carolina and his compatriots in Georgia and Florida to see about garnering their support.

Okay, SE divers and fishermen, call/write the governor's office and say you are totally against any Federal mucking with our state's environment, livelihood, and potential energy/economic benefits.

silentkiller
06-27-2008, 08:30 AM
"Spruce up his Legacy before leaving office"?

I think W's legacy is firmly entrenched at this point, running up a debt we'll never be able to pay, appointing a pack of idiots in numerous high offices whose only qualifications are they either raised a shit pot of $ for the RNC or were Bush loyalists, talking talking talking and then never standing up to a Democratic congress that he should have steam rolled over, and mismanaging a war that is a great opportunity to rid the world of a bunch of brainwashed Islamic punks (these people are still members of tribes for Christsakes). It's clear to me that he wasted the better part of 8 years and worrying about a legacy at this point is about as futile as Clinton trying to firm up his legacy the last days in office while he was selling pardons and smoking his proprietary blend of Monica cigars, thus insuring his legacy. I voted for W twice and honestly I expected a bit more than 2 paultry checks from the government coffers (I paid that money to them to begin with right?) We as American citizens deserve better, but it's our own damn fault cause we keep voting for these morons. Join me in voting out every person in office - local, state, or federal, regardless of party affiliation - it's the only way we have to send a message, if they're in office, send 'em home, it's the only way to find some that are interested in working for the people who voted for them instead of for their party or themselves. I'm glad I got that off my chest on a Friday morning, now I can get on with my day.